| Domain name registration
Complaints and conflicts
Policy for the .no domain
Current policy
How to change the policy
Norpol
History of changes
The administrative model
Domain name policy models
Look up domains
Statistics and analysis
FAQ
Glossary
Publications
|
Domain name policy for .noAppendix I: Complaint about Norid's decisions1. General provisions1.1 Decisions that may be challenged A domain-name applicant or holder may appeal against decisions made by Norid in relation to the domain name policy. No appeal may be lodged against decisions made by Norid as the secretariat in complaint cases. 1.2 Requirements for the basis of the complaint The complainant must provide evidence that the decision is in conflict with the domain name policy and of the clauses in the domain name policy with which the decision conflicts. Norid may reverse or change the decision on its own initiative if the appeal is found to be justified. 1.3 The Alternative Dispute Resolition (ADR) Committee's decision If the ADR Committee finds that Norid's decision was in conflict with the domain name policy in effect when the decision was made, and that the error significantly influenced the content of the decision, the Committee may decide that Norid's decision is to be annulled or amended. The ADR Committee may not make a decision to the disadvantage of the complainant. The ADR Committee may refuse a case if it finds that the case is so complex or doubtful that it is not suitable for consideration and decision by the ADR Committee. The ADR Committee may not make a decision in conflict with the regulations in effect for the .no domain. The ADR Committee may not make a decision about compensatory damages or coverage of costs for the parties. The ADR Committee's decision may not result in loss of rights for other applicants/holders. The ADR Committee's decision is final and no further complaint may be made about it. The decision does not impede any of the parties from subsequently submitting the dispute to the ordinary courts of law. 1.4 Liability Norid, Norid's employees, the ADR Committee and members of the ADR Committee cannot be held liable for actions or omissions made in connection with the complaint proceedings, unless the actions or omissions were in bad faith. 1.5 Blocking of the domain name while the complaint proceedings are in progress If the complaint applies to rejection of an application for registration and the domain name is still available, Norid will block registration of the name to which the complaint applies while the complaint proceedings are in progress. This hold will be implemented on the first working day after Norid has received a valid complaint and receipt for payment of the complaint fee in accordance with the complaint procedure. The hold will be maintained for the duration of the complaint proceedings. If the complaint is withdrawn, the hold on the domain name will be removed without further notice. 2. Complaint procedure2.1 Communication
Where the communication is received in more than one way, it is considered to be received on the earliest date of receipt. 2.2 Time limit for complaint The complaint must be lodged with Norid by the time limit for complaints, which is 30 days after the date on which the decision was received by the applicant/domain name holder. The decision is regarded as received by the applicant/holder at the latest 14 days after the decision has been sent from Norid to the registrar. 2.3 The complaint The complaint shall:
When the complaint has been sent to Norid, the complainant must pay the complaint fee in accordance with Clause 2.12 and send the receipt for payment of the complaint fee to Norid. 2.4 Opening of the complaint proceedings If Norid does not receive the receipt for payment of the complaint fee within 10 working days after Norid has received the complaint, Norid will regard the complaint as withdrawn. This does not impede the complainant from submitting a new complaint. If Norid finds that the complaint is not in accordance with the complaint regulations in effect, Norid shall immediately inform the complainant about the defects found in the complaint. If the complainant does not send a new corrected complaint within 3 working days after receiving such information, the complaint will be refused. This does not impede the complainant from submitting a new complaint. A refusal in terms of the previous paragraph may be appealed to the ADR Committee. The appeal must be lodged with Norid within 10 working days after notification of the refusal has been received by the complainant. A receipt for payment of the complaint fee must be enclosed with the appeal, as this is a condition for hearing the appeal. Norid shall send the appeal, the complaint and Norid's information about the defects in the complaint to the ADR Committee within 3 working days after Norid received the appeal. The Committee shall decide the appeal within 5 working days of receiving the appeal from Norid. If the Committee decides that the complaint is in accordance with the complaint regulations in effect, the complaint procedure will continue. The time limit for Norid's reply in accordance with Clause 2.5 runs from the date that the Committee's decision is received by Norid 2.5 Response from Norid Norid must send its response to the complaint to the complainant within 10 working days after the date that Norid is considered to have received the complaint. The response shall:
2.6 Submission to the ADR Committee Norid sends the complaint and the response to the ADR Committee when the response is sent to the complainant. The complainant is then informed that the case has been sent to the Committee and of the date on which a decision is likely to be available in normal conditions. 2.8 Stay and conclusion of the complaint proceedings without a decision Both parties have a duty to inform the ADR Committee immediately if the complainant files a case in the courts with respect to a domain name that forms the subject of a complaint. The complaint case will be stayed in anticipation of a final and legally enforceable decision, and resumed only if no final judgement is given or no court settlement is reached, and only if the complainant requires this. The complaint proceedings will be concluded without a decision if no claim for resuming them is submitted within 5 working days after the case is closed by the courts. The complaint proceedings will be concluded without a decision if the parties reach agreement and inform the ADR Committee of this. 2.8 The ADR Committee's decision
2.9 Publication All decisions will be published in full on Norid's Web pages and in Lovdata's information system Lovdata Online. If so required by one of the parties, information about technical equipment and procedures as well as operational and business matters which should be kept confidential for competitive reasons out of consideration for the party to which the information relates shall be excluded from publication. Requirements for secrecy must be submitted by the parties without being specially requested and in the parties' ordinary submissions. The ADR Committee decides whether, and if so, how parts of the Committee's decision shall be excluded from public access. 2.11 Implementation Norid will implement the decision by making the changes in the domain name database as directed by the decision as soon as possible and within 3 working days after the date on which Norid receives the decision. 2.11 Extension of time limits In extraordinary circumstances, the ADR Committee may extend the time limits that are specified in the complaint procedure.
If the ADR Committee decides that a meeting is to be held with attendance in person (cf Clause 2.8 b.) the complainant shall pay an extra charge of from 3 to 6 times the court fee. The amount of the extra charge and the deadline for payment is determined by the ADR Committee on the basis of the extra time that it is assumed that the meeting will require. 3. List of time limits
|
| UNINETT Norid AS • NO-7465 TRONDHEIM • Phone +47 07355 • Fax +47 73 55 79 99 • info@norid.no |